Tuesday, December 3, 2013
Electron transport, Chemiosmosis and the Photosystems
Last time, i talked about photosynthesis, and pigments. I'm just admitting it now, I forgot to mention/explain one thing, so I am explaining it here instead. Pigments are compounds that absorb light, and in the thylakoid membrane there are the chlorophylls a and b. However, there are more compounds, including carotenoids. Carotenoids don't absorb yellow, orange or brown. In fall, many plants lose their chlorophylls, but keep their carotenoids, making the leaves take on many different colors. Why is this important? Well, the chlorophylls and carotenoids are grouped together in clusters within the thylakoid membrane. Each cluster is referred to as a photo system. there are types of Photosystem, Photosystem 1 and Photosystem 2. Although similar in terms of the pigments each contains, they have very different roles in the light reaction process. The light reactions begin with absorbing light. By absorbing light, the pigment molecules aquire some of the energy carried by light waves. Within each photosystem, the aquired energy is quickly passed to other pigment molecules until it reaches a specific pair if chlorophyll a molecules. Now, I can explain this in five steps. Step 1: The light energy forces electrons to have a higher energy level in the two chlorophyll a molecules in photosystem 2. These electrons are said to be 'excited'
Step 2: The excited now have enough energy to leave the chlorophyll a molecules. Since they have lost electrons, the chlorophyll a molecules have now undergone an oxidation reaction.
Step 3: The electrons are now passed along a series of molecules called an electron transport chain. However, along the way, they lose most of the energy gained from sunlight. This energy is used to move protons into the thykaloid.
Step 4:As light excites the electrons in photosystem 2, it does the same in photosystem 1. It specifically excites the electrons in the chlorophyll a molecules. The electrons move away from that pair, and continue being passed along until they reach a primary electron acceptor. The electrons from photosystem 2 replace the ones lost in photosystem 1
Step 5: Electrons from photosystem 1 travel along an electron transport chain, and at the end of the chain, they combine with NADP+ and H+ to make NADPH. Finally, we are at chemiosmosis. This is derived from greek, chemia meaning alchemy and osmosis meaning pushing. Why bring this up? Well, alchemy was meant to be able to turn lead to gold, which is a little unrelated, or is it? The driving chemical energy of photosynthesis is ATP. ATP is produced by glucose. Comparison; "lead" glucose is turned into the "Gold" or ATP. Chemiosmosis relies on the concentration gradient of protons across the thylakoid membrane. I cant remember if I included this or not last time, but when water is broken down inside the thylakoid, some protons are produced. This makes up for some of the protons used, but not all of them. The others are brought in from the stroma. The energy required to due so is gained from the excited electrons from photosystem 2. See? It all ties into itself. Oh, wait there's more to chemiosmosis. The protons brought in from the stroma are used to build a higher and higher concentration gradient. Now, the concentration gradient of protons represents potential energy. ATP harnesses this potential energy into chemical energy. NADPH uses some of the protons too, and together, ATP and NADPH provide energy for the second set of reactions in photosynthesis. So, this is all a very detailed explanation of the first set of photosynthesis. It is called the light cycle too sometimes, because it harnesses energy from light. The second cycle is called the dark cycle, or, more commonly, the Calvin cycle. This will be explained further in the next post. Sorry for so many posts on photosynthesis, but the process is very long and very complicated. Also, it is probably important for the survival of every species of the planet, but let's not get ahead of ourselves
Sunday, November 10, 2013
Photosynthesis
Organisms can be classified based on how they obtain energy. There are autotrophs, organisms that manufacture their own energy, and heterotrophs, organisms that can't make their own energy. Animals, like humans, can't obtain their energy on their own, so they eat autotrpohs or heterotrophs that eat autotrophs. Confusing? Yeah, a little. Think of it like this, we eat steak, which comes from cows. But cows don't eat other cows, they eat grass. Grass is an autotroph, thus the food chain cycle is shown. But, how does a plant like grass obtain its energy? Plants get their energy through a process called photosynthesis. Photosynthesis involves a complex series of chemical reactions, even using a by product of a previous reaction. A plant releases oxygen as a byproduct in an early reaction, but need it in a later one. Back on topic, photosynthesis uses light as its fuel. A plant absorbs sunlight through chloroplasts. The light reactions take place in the thylakoids. To clear things up, the chloroplasts have a membrane surrounding three things. These are the thylakoids, grana and stroma. Thylakoids stack to form a grana, and is surrounded by a solution called the stroma. Moving on, plants are often picky with the light they absorb. As you probably know, the visible light spectrum includes red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo and violet. But, why are plants green most of the time? A part of the chloroplast is the chlorophyll. There are several types , but the two important ones are chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b. These are pigments, basically a compound that absorbs light. Chlorophyll a absorbs red to yellow light in the color spectrum, while chlorophyll b absorbs blue to violet light. This is why plants typically appear green. This is only the first stage in the entire process, but I'll get to electron transfer, chemiosmosis, and the different photo systems in my next post.
The Discovery of Cells
Cells are covered in many of the textbooks given to students in middle school and high school. But, who was it that discovered cells? The first observation of cells is attributed to an English scientist named Robert Hooke. He used a microscope to examine a thin slice of cork in 1665. He noticed that the cells appeared in "little boxes". You and me know that plant cells are the "little boxes" Hooke observed, but Robert was the first person to see them. He looked at carrots, ferns, and the stems of elder trees, and all of them displayed a similar formation of cells. Pattern? He was looking only at plant cells. The first person to observe living cells was a Dutch microscope maker named Anton van Leeuwenhoek. After 150 years, scientists began to organize the observations begun by Hooke and van Leeuwenhoek. They formed the cell theory. The theory has three parts: 1. All living things are composed of one or more cells. 2. Cells are the basic units of structure and function in an organism and 3. Cells only come from the reproduction of existing cells. The evidence to support this theory was provided by a trio of German scientists. In 1838, the botanist Matthias Schleiden concluded that all plants are made of cells. A year later, zoologist Theodor Schwann made the same conclusion about animals. Finally, in 1855, a physician named Rudolf Virchow reasoned that cells only come from existing ones. Over the years, modern scientists have gathered a lot of additional information that strongly supports the cell theory.
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Bernoulli 's Principles
Often, I see birds flying. Then, sometime later, I see a plane flying. Birds are light weight, have hollow bones and have to flap or use updrafts to fly. Planes, are huge metal things that have engines and literally, weigh tons. So how does a plane fly? Bernoulli was a scientist who observed that with any fluid, an increase in velocity equaled a decrease in pressure. It applies in actual fluids, like water, and with gas, like what we inhale and exhale. The airplanes wings are shaped so air has to cycle around it, creating low pressure above the wing and high pressure beneath it. That helps the plane to fly. There are always four forces acting on a plane. The planes weight, thrust, drag, and lift. The thrust has to be greater than the drag for it to go forward. For it to go upwards as well, it has to have greater lift than its weight. One of pilots worst enemies is gravity since it always wants to pull down the plane from 5000 feet up. Anyways, planes couldn't fly if they had a square shaped body. Why? The air wouldn't be able to circulate around it. Bernoulli said that the increase in velocity, for planes its mostly speed instead of direction, meant a decrease in pressure. http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Dictionary/bernoulli/DI9.htm
Monday, October 22, 2012
Fluids and Pressure
Pressure is simply how much force is applied to one area. Say, you have a cat laying on you lap and you petting it. The cat gets bored and walks away. The amount of pressure went from a large area, its body since it was laying down, to a small area, its paws. Pressure, like speed, acceleration, and momentum, can be increased or decreased. If you wanted to increase pressure on an object, you would either decrease the area you are applying it to, or increase the amount of force you are using. How are fluids related to this? Well, fluids, like everything one this planet, are made up of particles to small to see without a microscope. Water, for example, is made up of two hydrogen particles and one oxygen particle. They aren't as densely packed as a solid object, which is rigid (a good example is a tree. Try moving a full grown one without any tools). Since they are so loosely put together, its motion is random. The particles bounce into each other, away from each other, and go pretty much everywhere. If an object was dropped into a fluid, the object would be acted upon equally from all sides, constantly. Pressure is everywhere, especially in air (duh). At sea level, the air pressures roughly 2.2 pounds of pressure per square centimeter of your body. You wont notice though, since its pressuring equally from all sides. If you have ever gone in a plane, as you get higher in elevation, your ears pop. That's from the air pressure. The higher you get, the more air pressure there is. There is a lower density of breathable air as well, which is why you are in the plane and not outside it. I realize that air isn't related much to fluids, but water(or any other fluid) is a lot denser than air. Similar to the way that the pressure goes up as you get higher in the air, the pressure gets higher the farther down you go. If you went down 3300 feet without any equipment, your lungs would collapse and you would die. Its impossible to get that far down without equipment though, well, unless you were dead. Still, pressure gets higher when the elevation goes up, and gets higher the farther you go down in water.
http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/fluid_pressure.htm link
http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/fluid_pressure.htm link
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Density and the Titanic
Density is what makes something float or sink. The Titanic was thought to be unsinkable, until it hit an iceberg, and sank. The Titanic was made so if one level filled with water, it would still float. When the iceberg scraped the sides of the ship, it made holes on several levels. When the water flooded in, the Titanic had the same amount of space as it did before, but the water made it denser. The water flooded in and first it tilted, then was verticle, then it was too much weight the ship could bear so it broke in half and sank. If the iceberg hadn't hit so many levels, it could have maybe survived with the thousands of people on it. Most icebergs are bigger under the surface. Often, the visible part is only a fraction of the size, thus the expression, the tip of the iceberg. The lower section of the iceberg is completely invisible, so the captain didn't know were it was. It was dark and he couldn't see the iceberg until he almost collided with it. He tried to steer it away, but the lower decks got hit and let the water in. The water flooding in made it too dense to float. So, it sank, and took hundreds of people to the depths of the Atlantic ocean because there simply wasn't enough life boats.
Monday, October 15, 2012
Density
A heavy wooden block floats in water but a much lighter stone sinks. Why? Well, the stone is denser than the wood. The molecules that compose them are closer together in the stone than in the rock. Think of it like a storage container. One is packed with stuff when the other has a smaller amount of stuff shoved in. The one with more stuff is the exact same size as the one with less stuff, but weighs more. Why? Density. The stuff is much more densely packed into that unit. Density is mass per unit of volume. A stone weighs less than the wood, but is more dense, so it sinks. The wooden block is heavier but is less dense. http://www.physics.ucla.edu/k-6connection/Mass,w,d.htm
Newton Funnies
We saw a video explaining Newtons laws. It was quite funny. The first was a man sitting in a chair saying that an object at rest tends to remain at rest unless acted upon by an outside force then someone slams into him and shows an outside force acting on the person explaining. Then a man is running with an empty box. It shows a message saying Acceleration of an object is inversely proportional to the mass. he comes back running slower with another person in the box and then the man falls off the back. Next, it shows two men hitting each other. The man explaining is back and is saying that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Then the two men are leaning against each other. One suddenly runs off and the other guy falls to the floor. After that, the same two men run at each other, slam into each other then both fall to the floor. It then runs through credits then does bloopers. At the beginning, it has a warning. 'Do not attempt to do these stunts at home. The stunt men doing this are missing abundant brain cells.'
Thursday, October 11, 2012
Conserving Momentum
Momentum is what keeps you moving. Like when you run downhill, you go a lot faster than if you were running ordinarily, even when it evens out you still go fast. What kept you going was momentum. By keeping running down at the mostly steady speed, you built momentum which kept you going after the hill was even. If you hit a person, you would stop and they would go forward. Why? Because you transferred our momentum to them. Same concept with the game billiards. You hit the cue ball in a manner that hits other balls into the holes. You transfer the momentum from the cue ball to the other ones. I realize this might be confusing but heres a link:http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/airplane/conmo.html
Newtons Laws of Motion.
Sir Issac Newton made the three laws of motion we know of today. His first law was the law of inertia. He said every object was in a state of rest ,or not moving, and would remain so until acted upon. The example you see at http://science.discovery.com/interactives/literacy/newton/newton.html is you hitting an apple with a worm in it. However, if you suddenly stop the apple, the worm will continue moving. Its like when you suddenly slam on the brakes of a car, you hit the seat belt hard. You were moving at the same rate as the car until you suddenly stopped the cars movement. You, were still going until you hit the seat belt. His second law states that if the forces acting upon an object were balanced, the object wouldn't move. If two people were exerting an equal amount of force on say a rope, it wouldn't move. His third law is the most well known. It states every action have an equal and opposite reaction. If I threw a ball on the floor, it would bounce back, with the height it bounces upward with is equal to the force I applied throwing it. http://www.physics4kids.com/files/motion_laws.html
Thursday, October 4, 2012
Forces Simulator
The simulator started with a wooden figure pushing objects.(Sleepy dog, crate, text book, fridge, file cabinet, and mystery item) There was the file cabinet which to move over a surface with friction, needed to be at least 246 net force in either direction. When the forces are unbalanced it starts moving. However, after the force has been applied then no more is applied, the filing cabnet will stop moving due to friction and its weight. After the filing cabnet simulator, there is a robot moving company. You move another filing cabnet, a textbook and a sleepy dog. You only have a certain amount of energy to move one object. You cant push it too hard or your robot will run out of energy or it will fly off a cliff. Sometimes both. You have the unbalanced force of the robot, and then after friction and the weight of the object it will stop outside the door of a house. Sometimes, you push the object too hard and then have to stop it before it goes off the cliff, thus balancing the forces. Here is the simulator:http://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/forces-and-motion and here is another link helping explaining balanced and n balanced forces: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/newtlaws/u2l1d.cfm
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Combining forces
When some forces are acting upon a object, they are being combined. If two people are pushing against an inanimate object, lets say, one person is pushing with 5N and the other 2N. The object they are pushing would be acted upon with 7N. If the two people are against each other, the net force would be going with 3N in the direction of the person pushing with 5N. If two tug-of-war teams are exactly balanced, both will pull as hard as they can but not moth at all. The net force is 0. By using say 28N on both sides will get you nowhere at all. They are completely balanced. If one side was stronger, the object being acted upon would move in that direction. http://www.philbock.com/APphysics/labs/equilibriumlab.pdf
Monday, October 1, 2012
Balanced and unbalanced forces
Forces like everything else can be balanced or unbalanced. If There was a log floating on water, that would be a balanced force. Since the water pushing upwards and the weight of the log pushing downwards are equal to each other, its a balanced force. However, if an object was upon it, the weight of the log would be higher than the force of the water pushing up on it. Thus, it would be an unbalanced force and the log will sink a bit into the water. When something is being acted upon by two equal forces, we call it a balanced force. When something is being acted upon by two unequal forces, we call it an unbalanced force. http://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/mechanics/v/balanced-and-unbalanced-forces
Force: What is it?
Force is used every day every were. But what is it? Force is a push or a pull. If I was playing capture the flag and pulled some ones flag, I applied force while doing so. A more common example is when you push or pull a door to open it. When you push or pull the door, you are applying force. The amount of force you apply can be measured. A unit of force is called a newton or N. If something was 100N, it had a lot more force applied than something with ,say, 5N. http://www.edinformatics.com/math_science/force.htm This also explains t. (Probably a lot better too)
Friday, September 28, 2012
Science essay:What factors affect potential and kinetic energy
Many factors affect potential and kinetic energy. Kinetic energy is
energy in motion, while potential energy is energy that hasn't happened
yet. But what factors actually affect them? Kinetic and potential energy
are affected by various factors. Let's dive into them.
Kinetic energy is the energy an object produces when moving. Due to gravity, kinetic energy is affected by the object's mass and velocity. If, say, the Hagia Sophia was hit by an earthquake, the movement that this created would be an example of kinetic energy. Its structure was designed to be lightweight and flexible, as much as it could be with its enormous size. By reducing its mass, the Hagia Sophia's creators made sure it would be able to withstand earthquakes that destroyed the buildings surrounding it. The earthquake's strength determines its velocity so, say the earthquake was 6.5 magnitude. You would multiply the Hagia Sophia's mass by the velocity caused by the earthquake. Thus you would have the kinetic energy created by the earthquake.
Potential energy is a little different. It is the energy an object has the potential to create. The energy produced is determined similarly to kinetic. It depends on the object's mass, the gravitational pull when up or down slopes, and the height of the reference point. For example, if I was standing on the side walk and a car was in a garage, the reference point would be where I stood. When the car rolls out of the garage, it transforms its potential energy to kinetic. The car is being helped by gravity to go down the driveway, but gravity is the force on an object's mass. If a car was rolled down a hill, a heavier car would roll faster because its mass would be more affected by gravity.
The differences between the two are subtle, but important. The difference is the factors. Kinetic energy can be affected by velocity, while potential energy can be affected by reference point, such as the very tip of a cliff. If a boulder was on the tip of a cliff, the wind could move it ever so slightly so that it could come crashing down. The boulder's energy is potential until it is moved so that it rolls down the hill. Then it is kinetic. It is affected by both factors of kinetic and potential energy.
In summary, kinetic energy is the energy produced by movement and potential energy is the energy that could be created by movement. While some factors remain constant for both, the distinction between the two is that kinetic energy has a factor that potential energy doesn't have; velocity. Meanwhile, potential energy can be influenced by the object's reference point.
Kinetic energy is the energy an object produces when moving. Due to gravity, kinetic energy is affected by the object's mass and velocity. If, say, the Hagia Sophia was hit by an earthquake, the movement that this created would be an example of kinetic energy. Its structure was designed to be lightweight and flexible, as much as it could be with its enormous size. By reducing its mass, the Hagia Sophia's creators made sure it would be able to withstand earthquakes that destroyed the buildings surrounding it. The earthquake's strength determines its velocity so, say the earthquake was 6.5 magnitude. You would multiply the Hagia Sophia's mass by the velocity caused by the earthquake. Thus you would have the kinetic energy created by the earthquake.
Potential energy is a little different. It is the energy an object has the potential to create. The energy produced is determined similarly to kinetic. It depends on the object's mass, the gravitational pull when up or down slopes, and the height of the reference point. For example, if I was standing on the side walk and a car was in a garage, the reference point would be where I stood. When the car rolls out of the garage, it transforms its potential energy to kinetic. The car is being helped by gravity to go down the driveway, but gravity is the force on an object's mass. If a car was rolled down a hill, a heavier car would roll faster because its mass would be more affected by gravity.
The differences between the two are subtle, but important. The difference is the factors. Kinetic energy can be affected by velocity, while potential energy can be affected by reference point, such as the very tip of a cliff. If a boulder was on the tip of a cliff, the wind could move it ever so slightly so that it could come crashing down. The boulder's energy is potential until it is moved so that it rolls down the hill. Then it is kinetic. It is affected by both factors of kinetic and potential energy.
In summary, kinetic energy is the energy produced by movement and potential energy is the energy that could be created by movement. While some factors remain constant for both, the distinction between the two is that kinetic energy has a factor that potential energy doesn't have; velocity. Meanwhile, potential energy can be influenced by the object's reference point.
Saturday, September 22, 2012
Energy:Whats the law of conserving energy?
When I see a ball hit another one thats stationary, the one previously not moving starts rolling in the direction the ball that hit it was. But the now moving ball had no kinetic energy before it was hit. Also, the one that had previously been moving is either still or slowly stopping. Why? Well, the energy from the first ball was transferred to the other one. By doing this, it is stopped or stopping. The energy from the ball isnt gone it was only moved. If a car is going fast then suddenly brakes, it screeches and the wheels are getting hotter and hotter. What happened to the kinetic energy from the car? It was also transferred, but in a different way. The kinetic energy was transformed into the screeching noise and the heat coming off the tires. The energy isnt gone. Its only changed. A law of matter applies to this concept of conserving energy. Matter can not be created or destroyed, only changed. Energy is the same. It can change from kinetic to potential but cant go away or be destroyed. http://library.thinkquest.org/2745/data/lawce1.htm
Energy:How does potential energy become kinetic?
Energy transforms from potential energy to kinetic simple by having something act upon it. If I picked up a marker and then threw it, its energy would be kinetic. However, when I wasn't moving it, its energy was potential. Since it wasn't moving, it would only have potential energy until something acted upon it. If noting acted upon a object like the marker that couldn't make kinetic energy, that object would never have anything but potential energy. The name of the kind of energy is self explanatory, potential energy. The potential to make energy. Heres a link explaining http://sciencenetlinks.com/lessons/transforming-energy/
Thursday, September 20, 2012
Energy:The difference between Potential and Kinetic
The difference between Kinetic energy and Potential energy is somewhat confusing. Kinetic energy is energy in motion. If a car is driving along a road, its producing kinetic energy. A car parked in the dive way has the potential to produce energy by moving, but its not. Thus, it has potential energy. Anything moving produces kinetic energy while anything not moving has the potential to produce energy. That's the difference between the two types of energy. Here is a link http://www.differencebetween.net/science/difference-between-kinetic-energy-and-potential-energy/
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Acceleration:Motion song
In the Motion Song, made by Mr. Parr, It explains many things. Specifically, all the things that are related to motion like acceleration, velocity and speed to name a few. It tells you speed is a scalar quantity and shows you a chart graphing velocity. The song explains all the components of motion I know of pretty well in my opinion. Mr Parr makes pretty good songs explaining a lot of science related thing.
heres the link to the song:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9G1dhkRJ3ak
Here is a link explaining motion(Not a song):http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/motion.htm
heres the link to the song:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9G1dhkRJ3ak
Here is a link explaining motion(Not a song):http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/motion.htm
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Acceleration:How to graph it
When you are graphing acceleration, you match distance and time on the y and x axis. Distance is y usually and speed is x usually. If the object you are graphing is staying at a constant speed like 2 meters a second, the graph will be a straight line. However, if it changes speed over time, like it goes from 2 m/s to 18m/s it will be a curved graph. If you are graph an object that is decelerating, the graph will be slanting downwards instead of up. Again, the shape of the line (curved or straight) depends on if it is at a constant decreasing speed or one that is constantly changing. Here is a link to a website proving the same. http://physics.info/motion-graphs/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)